I hope nobody minds me joining this party over here
. I was just scrolling through the VSL and I thought I'd visit the Persian forum for a change. I was surprized to find this thread here...
It seems to me that homosexuality in the Middle East is seen more or less the same as paedophilia according to the information supplies on previous pages. Because of this association homosexuality is understandably seen as something unnatural and immoral.
It also seems that homosexuality is seen as a very "sexual" thing in the Middle East. That is what any sexuality is at its most base level it is about reproduction and how one achieves it emotions aside.
Since this is mostly focused on men, a saying that I once heard went like this
"men are like golfers, they just go from hole to hole." This seems to be what Shannenms is saying but in just a more polite fashion.
In New Zealand, homosexuality is pretty much the same as other places in the "West" much to be my disdain because it means that Maori men who have sex with men are using non-Maori methods of identity. Also to my disdain is the use of non-Maori indicators of sexuality being used by Maoridom as a whole (i.e. men don't cry - fortunately this is breaking as younger generations of Maori are being raised by their elders who are teaching them traditional values as opposed to the norms of the West that were prevalent in NZ that the children of the now old people were (in some cases) willing to adopt). I prefer the more traditional "who cares" approach because as far as I'm concerned it bothers me not what others do at night and who they do it with.
When I talk about mannerisms that ranges from how one carries oneself, their accent and what they believe their role is in a traditional Maori setting. A gay man/non-female who tries to do a female function and vice versa (lesbian women/non-males) deserves the full wrath of the elders because they're breaking ritual and are putting everyone at risk of spiritual danger (though "straight" people can also break ritual and they too equally deserve the anger of the elders if they break customs).
Traditionally Maori did not distinguish someone via sexuality. There was no need to. People were people, so if you slept with a bro one night and the next with a woman it didn't matter. The closest word in Maori that represents "homosexuality" is "takatapui" and that only refers to two people of the same gender having a platonic relationship, sometimes sexual. But yet you don't find the opposite, "straight" to describe two people of two different genders having a deep relationship. Traditionally there is no Maori word for bisexual either.
But we did have a word for effeminate men, which is whakawahine (to act like a lady). Though they didn't carry out any ritual functions and participated mainly in female roles. This kind of behaviour was common across the Pacific, though, I'm too sure if it was present at the time of European contact on Rapa Nui since there doesn't seem to be a similar term, or any term at all, for behaviours that differ from heterosexual.
These days we do have words for the different Western sexualities but these are largely constructed. For me, a person is a person first and sexuality is not that important. If only more people shared this view a lot of persecution would end...